Hi,
Are you saying that when you debug it steps right over the statement
MOVE xsetname+0(4) TO xsetn.
without executing it?
Sorry, I can't see any explanation for that, other than the code you are viewing in the debugger is not the same that is executing. Activation should fix that!
(Checking sy-subrc should certainly also be done, but it won't affect this behaviour)
cheers
Paul
Um, you forgot to mention the name of the function module.
Hi,
If you're going to learn a functional area as well, pick one that you are interested in yourself, and for which there are jobs in your local area.
I've never concentrated on one functional area. I just learn whatever is needed to do the job. Your next assignment could be FI-CO and the one after that could be PM!
good luck
Paul
Hello Dave,
Thank you for your reply.
Just to make sure we are on the same page I am talking about Customs Management Export.
I do not see message type I5570 defined in my SAP GTS. We are using message schema CUS_NL and not CUS_NL_2 (AGS) yet...
Regards, Tiago
Hi Kemin and all,
Thanks for your help. I have finally managed to make it work... but I must admit that I can not explain exactly why. 
I have :
I have also imported the source directly into the project's root instead of the WebContent folder as you can see on the pic below.
And "voilà"! 
J.
Hi Akesh
these are the only options.
Your analysis is correct.
I would prefer option 1
Ajay M
Hi Abhijit,
According to me the authorization check works as expected. Company Code is not used in the selection so it will display the aggregated values because of the aggregation authorization (the colon : authorization).
In order to avoid the issue described above, I suggest to make the input-ready authorization variable for Company Code mandatory to force a selection on Company Code. Now only authorized Company Codes (i.e. ABC) can be selected.
Best regards,
Sander
Hi, I face a similar issue and get exactly the same error when using SMP3.0. Kindly let me know if you were able to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Warm regards
Hi Emilio,
Have a look at the user guide and whats new on this link about analysis for office.
http://help.sap.com/boao?current=boao
Analysis for office is free, just like EPM add in.
Analysis 2.2 installation includes EPM add in.
have a look at this article.
Announcing general availability of Analysis Office 2.2
For IBP the best is to use Analysis for office.
Andy
Hi Amit Singh, can i have u r contact number?
Hi Ram,
If you want to use BADI then don't switch on ENABLE_HANA_MDX
It is just a different engine to calculate MDX.
Using ABAP to calculate MDX won't have a huge performace issue.
that setting is there for those who doesn't use BADI and want to take the full benefit of HANA.
Andy
Ola Lucas,
If everything is tudo bom then please mark the correct and/or useful answers to close the thread.
regards
Rick
Sorry for the slow reply. That's a tricky one.
I think you are probably looking at a custom auth object and a BADI implementation during purchase order creation to achieve this.
The only other approach I could think of is to create a custom auth object and make the contract field in ME59N mandatory for users which don't have it. I'm not sure if that is technically possible.
Hi Julie
Credit note manually created. not drawn from invoices.
But individual documents showing the GP Amount correctly, only the issue with the Total of the GP%
Thanks
Gobi
Just to exclude this as a possible reason, the first thing I'd do is upgrading the kernel patch at least to the required minimum, which is 300. Better yet, go with the latest which is 323 right now.
Once that's done, re-test the theme and see if this helped.
By the way, you shouldn't get a green indicator with PL 221... are you sure about that?
Hi Experts,
We make master-detail application from template.
Master view is ok and shown entityset properly.
But with Details view we have next problem:
We change code of template application to remove navigation table due to request one entity
_onRoutePatternMatched: function(oEvent) { if (oEvent.getParameter("name") !== "details") {return;} this._sItemPath = "/" + oEvent.getParameters().arguments.entity; this._sNavigationPath = this._sItemPath + "/" + ""; // Bind Object Header and Form using oData var oModel = new sap.ui.model.odata.ODataModel(this._sPath, true); oModel.read(this._sNavigationPath); sap.ui.getCore().setModel(oModel);
},oModel.read generates GET request and get correct answer:
But .setModel doesn't set model properly. When view rendered we get empty fields.
Here is xml for view:
<InputListItem label="Status"> <Input placeholder="Empty" value="{SrmState}"/> </InputListItem>We try many ways to get result (changing view.xml, adding .attachRequestCompleted etc...) but no success.
Hi Jay,
Just to be sure. "Unassigned Item" is selected as default in Show filter when you open Business Task Management.Try with "All Items".
If still the PO cannot be found, need to raise an incident.
Best Regards,
Fred
Hi,
I think that a column chart with RCC and Description as dimensions and Created variable as a measure will suffice.
Regasrds,
Rogerio
Hi Sandip
We can generate automatic multiple batch at the time of GR from Production.
Let us consider, Production Order Quantity is 100.
1. Do GR from Production in MIGO or MB31 with 101 Movement Type.
2. While doing GR enter the quantity as 50 and check (F7) then system will generate batch automatically if the Material is having Batch Management check in the Material Master.
3. DO GR for remaining quantity 50 and check then system will generate automatic batch.
Please do check and revert back.
Regards
Suresh.M
Hi Brahmankar,
Thanks for your response. I did see OSS note 1434993 before posting my question in this forum. We are on Support Package SAPKH60409 which is greater than SAPKH60406. So, I believe the above is already addressed/covered. Also, we are not using Planning Strategy 52, Planning w/o final assembly. We are using MTS, Planning Strategy 10.
Also I could not follow the English in the above OSS note. It is very confusing. Can anybody explain in simple words?
Also what does "Procurement without requirements" mean in MS04 when we visit the "Pegged requirements screen". Is this a way of SAP reporting an error resulting from an MRP run? Please clarify.
Thanks
HSM
