Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8798 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Defect codes during result recording valuation

$
0
0

Hello Werner,

 

As promised, here is my new proposal for your requirement (i have deleted my previous reply)

 

Here is a summary of what you asked :

A quantitative characteristic has a lower tolerance limit (L) and lower plaus. limit (LP). Whe the actual value is between LP and L the system should create defect X1. If actual result is less than LP then X2 defect should be generated.

 

Solution with calculated characteristic:

First step is to create your main characteristic (Quantitative with mandatory recording). You don't need to put L and LP there because we will be maintaining them in the task list itself.

Then create a second characteristic (calculated). It is similar to the first one except you will maintain these parameters :

- Calculated flag should be on in control indicators

- Defect recording checked

- Lower tolerance limit as 2 and upper limit tolerance as 4 (you will understand why later in the process)

- Maintain upper limit defect code X1 and lower limit defect code X2

- Use Sample procedure checked.

 

Once you have both characteristics created, you need to create the formula for the second one.

Since actual value can only be in one of the three intervals at a time :

interval 1 : inferior to LP

interval 2 : between LP and L

interval 3 : Superior to L

 

We will create 3 formulas each one will have a result as follow:

interval 1 ==> 1 (1 will be lower than 2 (inf limit of char2) which will generate X2 defect)

interval 2 ==> 5 (5 will be superior to 4 (sup limit of char2) which will generate X1 defect)

interval 3 ==> 3 (3 is between 2 and 4 so no defect is created)

 

These formulas will have the following parameters :

-param 1 : actual measured value of first characteristic

-param 2 : Lower specification limit of first characteristic (L)

-param 3 : Lower plaus. limit for first char. (LP)

 

param2 and param3 will be maintained in task list call of formulas directly.

 

 

Now lets create 3 formulas. Formulas are maintained in table TFKT using SE16.

The system is allowing table maintenance for this table using SE16 as per oss note 0000560672

 

In this table you have two fields, formula key and formula. Maintain the formulas as show below :

 

FORM1IF #1<#2 THEN 1 ELSE 0
FORM2IF #1<=#3 AND #1>=#2 THEN 5 ELSE 0
FORM3

IF #1>#2 THEN 3 ELSE 0

 

Now go to task list and assign your two characteristics as follow:

 

char 1 : your main characteristic

char 2 : your calculated characteristic.

 

Assign sampling procedures to both. Please note that in sampling procedure for calculated characteristic should have a valuation type "Mean Value with tolerance range".

 

The system then will ask you to maintain formula for calculated characteristic. Enter the following formula:

 

TFKT:FORM1(C00010,L)+TFKT:FORM2(C00010,L,LP)

+TFKT:FORM3(C00010,L)

 

As you can see i used two lines because the field is not enough for entire call.

You can see that i am adding the three intervals results and the result will be depending on where the actual value lies.

Please note also that you need to replace L and LP in the formula as per your need.

C00010 represents the mean value of recorded characteristic. the system is using the following notation :

 

AABBBB

AA is the code representing the information (in our case C0)

BBBB is the id of the characteristic (in this case 0010)

 

Save your task list and create inspection lot.

 

When you enter result recording, you only maintain value for first characteristic then close bloth lines, the system will automatically valuate second one and generate defect code as per your requirement.

 

 

PS: I have gone through this proposed solution and i actually tested the scenario and it works perfectly.

 

Let me know if this is clear for you.

 

 

Regards,

Ayoub.


Re: Unable to update PDS to APO

$
0
0

Hi Brahmankar,

 

When i run MRP run in APO. MRP get fail. i am sending you screen shorts.

mrp_error1.GIF

mrr_erro2.GIF

 

thanks and regards,

 

subhash waydande

Re: Unable to add std PR approval service multiple times from diff systems

$
0
0

Ensure username exist in all the systems.

Rfc destination shd be trusted

 

Current user should be checked

Re: Signal 11 thrown by SAP

$
0
0

And yes do check these notes which I shared before, that have a lot that you can do.

A slight tuning can be very effective,

 

1497677 - AIX: Apparent memory leak in EM

1972803 - SAP on AIX: Recommendations

973227 - AIX: Virtual Memory Management Tuning Recommendations

 

Regards,

Re: Signal 11 thrown by SAP

$
0
0

Hi Benjamin,

 

I don't think ulimit change is at all required. As this is already recommended by SAP for AIX environment.

 

ulimit.png

Re: Error while doing PGR (post goods issue for sales order return)

$
0
0

Can anyone please help me as i am getting the same error at the time of Post goods receipt.

 

i had done sales with WBS element, Delivery (PGI) done with batch and serial number and done the invoice.

but when i am doing Sales return with reference to invoice, i got two line items with Batch split so i made some changes in Copy control VTAF (deselect the copy item number)., now i am getting single item at the return sales order level,

I made return item category with special stock as "Q"(Project stock)

 

But while i am doing the PGR that time i am getting an error as Special stock Q is not supported please check the entries.

 

Guys please help me.

 

Thanks in advance

Problem in me21n(po)

$
0
0

I have attached smart forms to ME21N TCODE  through NACE tcode while entering header text in me21n screen but that header text will  get displayed in item text for some purchase order plz help me reply me ASAP.

BW report in Arabic

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

I am recently working for a middle east client. They wish to see the SAP BW reports in Arabic.

I think we can achieve it through "translation setting" and "Unicode" setting. But I don't have any idea on both. Please help with your inputs.  

Thanks.


Plan value in RA (KKA2) different from CJ20N

$
0
0

Dears, A project plan and budget got revised several times due to many changes from customer, now we got the final estimations and updated the same in CJ20N, however when we are running RA for the same project for June 2015, its showing different cost as comparing to CJ20N. Could you please help us to make correction in RA to be in sync with CJ20N.. Thanks, Lokesh

Re: No retro run for the suspension revocation

$
0
0

Hello,

 

As per my understanding of your question, you can assign this EE to another Payroll area when he goes overseas , this way he is active, and not taking part in PY, and then when he comes back, you can put him to the old py area.

Plz try this and check.

 

Regards,

Vishwas

Re: how do i write a C++ dll which a parameter ref the string for powerbuilder?

$
0
0

hello mark, thanks,i have checked the link,but i still confused that char ** means string array or refrenece a string pararmeter in POWERBUILDER,what do you think?

it sounds like i should use char ** as parameter in C++ if i'd like to reference the string In Powerbuilder to cosume the C++ dll

regards

Ken

Permission rules in GRC 10.1

$
0
0

Greetings,

 

In the version 5.3 we had four different types of rules viz.

1. Action rules

2. Permission rules

3. Critical Action rules

4. Critical Permission rules.

 

In the GRC 10.x version I understand that Action and Critical Action rules are stored in table GRACACTRULE but I'm not able to find any information pertaining to Permission and Critical Permission rules. Do we have these rules in GRC 10.x version at all. May be I'm missing something very basic but I'd be grateful if someone can throw some light on this.

 

Thanks, Janantik

It 0045 Configuraation ?

$
0
0

Hi Experts

 

Kindly i want useful Document or explanation for it0045 (loans) Configuration by steps

 

and what should i change in schema

 

Kindly note that all loans without interest .

 

Best Regards

Re: I want to learn SAP HANA

$
0
0

Hi Shantanu,

 

For HANA no need for any coding knowledge, but you must technically able to understand what is database,layer and other terms.If you are going for certification then can you approach SAP india (Bangalore )or various trainingcenter (ATOS) are offering HANA (Training with Certification ).

 

All the best for certification.

 

Regards

Murugan c

Re: Symbolic Account Creation


Re: Runtime error while creating sales order

$
0
0

Hello Shivshankar,

 

Usually this error occurs when there is a overflow of numbers during the arithmetic operation.

 

Here it is adding the values from *kompax to kompaxa.


For example let's take field BRWTR which is of length 15.


It is having value '999999999999999'(15 character length) now if you even add 1 to it it will become 16 digits which will lead to the runtime error.


Check which field is oerflowing in your case and solve it accordingly.

 

FieldLength
BRTWR15
NETWR15
MWSBP13
NETPR11
WAVWR13
KZWI113
KZWI213
KZWI313
KZWI413
KZWI513
KZWI613
CMPRE11
SKFBP13
BONBA13
CMPRE_FLT16
NRAB_VALUE13
PAYMNT15

Facing issue to include IDOC Status Change Z Program in APO Process Chain

$
0
0

Hi Exeperts,

 

Data Flow:

 

Interface 1 --> Interface 2--> APO system. Interface to APO data flowing through IDOCs.

 

Part of IDOCS Monitoring improvement, we developed z programs which the IDOC status will convert from status 51(Red) to 68 (Green)

 

Condition:  Materials which are having the Material status only B,C,D and these Material IDOCs fails with Status 51 in production system need to capture in staging area DSO and then BW Reporting.

 

Businenss Requirement: failed IDOCs status needs to convert from Status 51 to 68

 

Solution:  Developed Z Program which changes the IDOC status from 51 to 68 for the Materials which are having the Material status only B,C,D.

 

Issue/Problem: ZProgram is working fine if executed the zprogram in SE38 and then schedule in background for different message types

PBAPS_CHANGEKEYFIGUREVALUE2, PIRAPS_SAVEMULTIPLE, MOAPS_SAVEMULTIPLE2, STAPS_SAVEMULTIPLE2

 

 

where as Zprogram not working , IDOCs monitoring happening in APO production by running a process chain. Process chain is a meta chain which have 2 local process chains.where 1 local process chain have IDOC Parallol Processing different programs(RBDAPP01) for different above message types as different processes. In 2nd local process chain after processing the IDOCs needs to move DSO1 and then copying DSO1 to DSO2, Activating DSO2, delete index for DSO2, selective deletion in DSO2.

 

we just tested the zprogram in background and not included in process chain during Unit Testing and the program working fine.

 

where as Integration Testing and the ZProgram has to include in this IDOCs monitoring Process Chain. I included this zprogram in the 2nd local process chain and tried to run the process chain found no result. Included this zprogram between 1local process chain and 2nd local process chain and found no result the status 51 is not changing to 68.

 

I am in very much force from my client, I would like to request,kindly go through the problem issue and suggest me where i have to include this zprogram to change IDOC status from 51 to 68.

 

Note: Because of Test data issue in Quality, we are using WE19 to reprocess the failed IDOCS and generating new idoc and using for testing purpose.But in production IDOCs are coming, monitored to APO system by using the Local process chain as explained.

 

Pls reply me if you didnt understand the issue details completely or properly.

 

 

Regards,

SV

Re: wrong stock overview because of alternative unit of measure

$
0
0

Dear Jurgen

 

Thanks for your kind reply

 

here's the Mb51 report with unit of entry and also Quantity tab in GR document.

Re: Custo de frete presente na mesma nota do produto

$
0
0

Olá André,

 

Na vedade o cenário que temos é o seguinte:

 

Tenho um pedido criado para recepção de uma mercadoria que tem ICMS e IPI. Esta mercadoria tem um valor total bruto de R$ 100,00.

 

Junto com a entrega desta mercadoria, o fornecedor também me cobra um custo de frete. Para o exemplo em questão eu simulei a situação com o mesmo valor de R$ 100,00. Ou seja, a minha nota fiscal tem um valor total de R$ 200,00 (Sendo R$ 100,00 para os protudos e R$ 100,00 do custo do frete).

 

A BC do ICMS de fato tem que ser em cima do valor total, R$ 200,00 que você citou, porém este custo complementar que eu tenho que é o frete, eu não possuo imposto nenhum associado a ele, ou seja, o fornecedor me cobra R$ 100,00 de frete e eu lanço na MIRO como um custo complementar (IVA C0) no valor de R$ 100,00.

 

Só que no momento que a NF-e é gerada, ele por algum motivo calcula algum imposto em cima do valor do frete, fazendo com o que o mesmo passe de R$ 100,00 para R$ 115,11.

 

Eu acho que este comportamento do SAP não está correto, não?

 

Desde já agradeço a ajuda.

 

Atc,

Rodrigo Amorim

Re: ITSM error: The selected SAP component is not valid

$
0
0

Also check:

1984221 - Job "SM: GET FILE TYPES FROM SAP" failing with System exception in

Solution Manager 7.1

 

Thanks

Vikram

Viewing all 8798 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images