Hi,
In the First Component WD1 of Window WD1_W right click on View 2 WD1_V2 and set it as default.
If you are using WD1 for some other purposes where V1 should be Default view, Create another Window in WD1 (say WD1_W2) and in that drag and drop V2 and make it as default.
Then call WD1_W2 from WD2.
Hope this helps u.,
Regards,
Kiran
Hi Venu,
At table ROOSFIELD, enter data source name and keep SELECTION as "A". execute the it check the out put. if you won't get list mean no fields are hidden.
again check the table contents, remove SELECTION "A" and just enter data source name and display table out put.
What ever the field are in that table those fields will be visible at RSA6(other than Hidden fields).
if not showing like that, if you see fields at LBWE, maintenance , Right side pane Communication str.
Move them to left.
Even if not seen what you need, then deactivate data source. again activate data source from RSA5 and do as you done at first time. do this on dev system only.
Thanks
Hi Paul,
You can directly test the function module at SE37, give the inputs and test it.
You have two place to apply this FM, 1. PSA to DSO Level transformation
2. DSO to Cube level transformation.
If your not doing reporting DSO, then you can routine between DSO to Cube level, do on Dev system and check. once it fine then move the same changes to production.
Thanks
Hi,
You cannot pass bulk data like structure or internal table through URL parameters. Why don't you use the other component in your component via Component usage.
Check the Component Usage Tutorial here: http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-8863
If you don't want to use the Component usage, pass the data using shared memory objects. Check my document here: http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-27396
The above mentioned Import/Export memory won't work in Web Dynpro context.
Hope this helps u.,
Regards,
Kiran
Hi Selva kumar,
What about BOM and it's components? Whether you have activated backflush for BOM components? IF yes, please check any incorrect movements in COGI. What about the production order status? Whether you have done any GI, Confirmation or GR? If yes, cancel all those movements and try again.
Thanks
Hi Experts,
I assigned a milestone functions to "Release following activities" to one of the activity which triggers when the activity is confirmed. The following activity is not in the same network. It is in different network. And i created a FS relationship between these two activity. When i did confirmation via CJ20N, milestone function triggered and executed with out any message and got the required results which is the following activity (different network) got released.
But when i did the confirmation via CN25, i got a message as " One or More than one activity was not release. See log"...When i continue the transaction further, the activity get confirmed but the following activity (different network) did not released.
Could you please help me resolve this issue as my client want to do confirmation only via CN25???
Regards
Vetrivelan
Hi Eli,
You are right that ZRVT is a Header condition and can only be entered @ Header level.
However, one thing to keep in mind is that the header condition entered @ Header will be passed on to the item. Here in your case, as your condition type - ZRVT has 1000 USD (consider you have 5 line items) then 1000 USD would be made applicable as part of the ZRVT condition type for all the items.
This is due to the reason that the calculation type is "Fixed Amount".
Please let me know for any clarifications.
regards
As there is no relation between GR (101) movement & stock transfer, I feel its not possible in standard.
Even with Custom development, it will not be achievable. Because, you may receive 100 qty. In stock, already, some 200 qty may be available. Out of 300, you may transfer 70 qty. How do you know which qty (From received lot i.e., 100 or In hand stock i.e., 200) you are going to transfer.
Also, if you have made 01 inspection type, then all qty should be checked in Quality before moving to unrestricted stock. So, no qty requires 08 inspection type.
I hope, I have understood your question correctly & answered appropriately. If not, please make me to understand your query again.
HI Madhav,
Have You done this scenario. If still facing issues refer this document..
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-45777
Regards
Satish
I am not sure what you meant by Work Order.
You can add one operation as Vendor Inspection & MIC can be assigned to that operation. By having appropriate Configuration & Master data settings, Inspection lot will be generated. So, you can record the vendor inspection results.
Hi Expert,
Is it possible to close WBS and Activity using milestone function?....If so, could you please explain it?
Regards
Vetrivelan
Hi Andriy,
Check below Screen Shot ,are you maintain 'rfcexec' in program name ?
then test your RFC destination , you getting below message .
Check this link ...SAP Library - TREX - Configuration Documentation
Program Name : <disk_drive>:\usr\sap\ECC_<instance_number>\rfcexec.exe
Gateway Host : Host name (with domain name if necessary) or
the IP address of the host on which the gateway is installed.
Gateway Service: Name of the gateway in the form sapgw<instance_number>
Regard's
Smruti
Have you maintained the technical settings for survey as given below:-
Thanks
Kumar
Hi Venkat,
Seems like MD2 is primary one, MD1 is reference of MD2. if yes then you may be loaded data to MD2 properly and activate master data.
At info cube level if you added MD1, at transformations you may chose as read master data. Your MD1 object will be filled at cube level. once you do report you can access what you need.
What ever you have info object(think so - MD1 iobj) at cube level, need to be filled.
Thanks
1. How do I need to create the Authorization?
Currently we work with Menu- and Auth Roles with the corresponding Analysis Authorization.
Follow this wonderful doc http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-11451
2. Is there an easier way of creating/maintaining the Authorizations if we work with Info-Object-Catalogs?
Do we still need Menu-, Auth Role and Analysis Authorization?
You can't create authorizations on catalogues. You still need Menu, Roles, Authorization Profiles and Analysis Auth..
3. Are we able to restrict User in such a way that in one report
- the User will have access for all company codes and restrictions on Profit center
- but in another report has restriction to one company code and no restriction to Profit center but on business area?
Yes it is possible. You have to create separate roles and give access as per your requirement. You have to assign same report with different authorizations to two roles.
4. If we need to stay with Menu- and Auth Role with Analysis Authorization:
What is the advantage of giving Authorization by Info Object catalog?
The maintanance of Menu- and Auth Role will be low but the maintanance of the User profile's will be big.
As I said, it is not possible to give authorization by catalogue. It is only possible by individual objects like Infoobject, Inforpoviders etc..
Regards,
Suman
Hi Abhi,
Thanks a ton for your help 
Kind Regards,
Aamir
Hi Prabhakar,
Without BW you cannot have BPC NW. The flow of data is from ECC -> BW -> BPC cube. The data that we save in BPC cubes are stored in BW under a separate namespace(/CPMB/). Hence the integration of BPC with ECC without BW is not possible.
Regards,
Kalyan.
Hi Divya,
The formula should be:
transaction_no LIKE "GR*"
-Abhilash
Hi,
When doing return delivery, I need to restrict batch tab to get displayed based on movement type.
Restricting batch tab is possible only in badi VBDOCUBATCH-PRODUCT_CHANGE ( Paramter C_CONTROL)
This BADI is triggering at first. Before this badi triggers we need to capture movement type and have to do restriction in badi VBDOCUBATCH-PRODUCT_CHANGE.
I would like to know whether any possibility to achieve the same through configuration. I am not getting any enhancement to achieve this.
Thanks & Regards,
Priya
Hi,
have a look at my blog:
Regards,
Michal Krawczyk
