Field added in Selection View of LDB ADA not reflecting in Dynamic Selections

July 8, 2015, 6:42 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Error while trying to open a dashboard via Infoview

≪ Previous: Re: New business functionality in EHP7 LOG_SD_PRICE_LIST_2, gave report V_NLN

$

0

0

Hi All,

 

For the requirement, i want the field ANEPV-BWASL to show in the dynamic selections of the report RABEST_ALV01 ( Tcode - S_ALR_87011994 )  I added the field in the selection view of the corressponding Logical database ADA by choosing the field by selecting the preselect check box. I have assigned to the functional groups also .

 

The problem here is the field is not showing in the dynamic selections or it is not reflecting.

 

Can anyone provide the solution for this.

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

Ramesh.S

---

Error while trying to open a dashboard via Infoview

July 8, 2015, 6:43 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: IW72 or IW73 report costs appearing as zero

≪ Previous: Field added in Selection View of LDB ADA not reflecting in Dynamic Selections

$

0

0

Hi guys ,

 

I need your help.

I created couple of dashboards through DS 1.5 ( installed in the server too ) and I cannot get the report in Infoview. It looks like it's loading but I can't get anything.

It's working properly while I am trying to execute the dashboard through DS

Re: IW72 or IW73 report costs appearing as zero

July 8, 2015, 6:43 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Assignment of Assortment to Assortment Users

≪ Previous: Error while trying to open a dashboard via Infoview

$

0

0

Hi Gibson,

 

Check this note

 

2033695 - IW72 fields are blank

Solution provided here is open the order in IW32 and save, this should correctly. Not sure this is similar to your requirement but try this out.

Regards

Terence

Re: Assignment of Assortment to Assortment Users

July 8, 2015, 6:31 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: BO 4.1 Installation - no SIA after installtion

≪ Previous: Re: IW72 or IW73 report costs appearing as zero

$

0

0

Hi,

 

this is somehow a strange question. As I don't know which master data is created in your system and I don't know which stores you want to assign to which assortments how should I be able to provide you the necessary data?

 

You just have to select the appropriate assortments and the you can assign stores...

Here's an example... but as said above: it depends on the master data maintained in YOUR system...

 

Same is applying to creation of assortments - it is depending on your business concept to figure out which fields have to be maintained with which settings...

 

Regards

Tobias

Re: BO 4.1 Installation - no SIA after installtion

July 8, 2015, 6:43 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Should ROE restrict "necromancing"?

≪ Previous: Re: Assignment of Assortment to Assortment Users

$

0

0

I am Facing the same problem how to resolve it

 

I had re installed the server and now i am unable to Start CMC

 

How did you resolved the Issue

 

 

Please advise

 

Thanks

Krishna.

Re: Should ROE restrict "necromancing"?

July 8, 2015, 6:44 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Duplicate Records in DM Log

≪ Previous: Re: BO 4.1 Installation - no SIA after installtion

$

0

0

Yay! Thanks, Michael! Good to know this has been clarified and taken care of now.

 

@Stephen - I hope CC will still be somewhat loosely moderated, it's also unlikely someone complaints.

Duplicate Records in DM Log

July 8, 2015, 6:45 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Installation error: Instance SID/ASCS01 (PARTIAL) did not start after 5 minutes

≪ Previous: Re: Should ROE restrict "necromancing"?

$

0

0

Dear Experts,

 

We have implemented BADI for some calculation.

 

If we are changing the input values and executing the BADI again , we are getting warning showing some records are rejected and it is due to duplicate records.

 

We checked further, and found that it are those records which actually are written using the badi which was executed earlier.

 

We have properly scoped the dimension in the script logic.

 

We are using BPC 10.1 NW standard version.

 

Regards,

Re: Installation error: Instance SID/ASCS01 (PARTIAL) did not start after 5 minutes

July 8, 2015, 6:45 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: cannot perform rfc lookup

≪ Previous: Duplicate Records in DM Log

$

0

0

Hello @all,

 

in our case it was a DNS-problem. With only maintaining /etc/hosts it's obviously not done.

 

Installation worked now with instances 00 and 01.

 

Thanks for your help,

 

Regards,

Julia

---

cannot perform rfc lookup

July 9, 2015, 6:56 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: YTD data is not calculated correctly

≪ Previous: Re: Installation error: Instance SID/ASCS01 (PARTIAL) did not start after 5 minutes

$

0

0

Hi SDNites,

 

I am getting RFC look up errro in QA environment. It is working finr in Dev envirionment. RFC communication channel in Dev and QA have the same name.

 

Also one thing I have noticed is that if I goto test tab in MM and modify the CC specified parameters tab which is effectivley delete and add the same then it works fine.

 

Can you please advise why this behviour.

 

Regards,

Abhishek

YTD data is not calculated correctly

July 9, 2015, 6:56 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: No response when clicking on Req Approval or PO approval in launchpad

≪ Previous: cannot perform rfc lookup

$

0

0

Hi,

 

Wondering if anyone has some idea on what the problems are here.

 

Issue description:

1. In a Periodic model on BPC NW 10.0 800 SP13, YTD value is not calculated correctly as shown below. Somehow month July YTD data take July Periodic data and treating July as the first month and YTD data continued from July onwards again. Revenue is INC accounttype, This seems to only happen to INC/EXP accounttype.

 

2. Example of Time Dimension is shown below

 

Any ideas what to verify?

 

Many thanks

Jingjing

No response when clicking on Req Approval or PO approval in launchpad

July 9, 2015, 6:57 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: WRITE BACK BADI LIMIT

≪ Previous: YTD data is not calculated correctly

$

0

0

Hi,

 

We have configured Fiori for Requisition Approval and Purchase Order Approval.  Both apps appear in the Launchpad showing zero items for approval.  If I click on either application, nothing happens.  It should open to show zero items for processing.

 

Please see screen shot attached.

 

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Best Regards,

Rick

Re: WRITE BACK BADI LIMIT

July 9, 2015, 6:57 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Retrieve the parent SFC based on the component SFC

≪ Previous: No response when clicking on Req Approval or PO approval in launchpad

$

0

0

"Write Back Badi's for scenario's like Currency Conversion" -??? Why?? In most cases you don't need currency conversion to happen immediately!

 

Inside single write back badi you can check for particular environment and model and use different code...

 

Vadim

Retrieve the parent SFC based on the component SFC

July 9, 2015, 6:57 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: MAP Change in Previous period/Prev. Year.

≪ Previous: Re: WRITE BACK BADI LIMIT

$

0

0

Hello,

 

We have a special request that the client can read the component SFC only, and then based on the component SFC it wants to search out which parent SFC.

 

I searched all the possible PAPI in ME 6.0 SDK, but couldn't find one, could anyone advice how to implement this customization into our client, besides to access to the database directly?

 

Thanks & regards,

Leon

Re: MAP Change in Previous period/Prev. Year.

July 9, 2015, 6:58 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Fiori Tile Error - Could not open app. Try again later.

≪ Previous: Retrieve the parent SFC based on the component SFC

$

0

0

You correct your issue today. You leave April and May as is.

Time travel is not possible and you would not just need to correct a single document, you would need to correct ALL documents posted since then to have a correct forward projection till today.

Re: Fiori Tile Error - Could not open app. Try again later.

July 9, 2015, 6:58 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Triggers on $TA tables (Text Analysis Tables)

≪ Previous: Re: MAP Change in Previous period/Prev. Year.

$

0

0

Hi Krishna,

 

Here are the screenshots for the errors noted in the developer tools.

 

1. When the page loads, I get these missing resources

 

The location its trying to look at for the files above

 

2. When I click on the tiles, the following events are triggered followed by the error noted from the console.

---

Re: Triggers on $TA tables (Text Analysis Tables)

July 9, 2015, 6:59 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Disable remove option in Employee Master

≪ Previous: Re: Fiori Tile Error - Could not open app. Try again later.

$

0

0

We have a need of trigger on $TA tables where we wanted carry out some processing whenever there is negative sentiment on a real time basis. Trigger on $ table seems to be an only option But did not work. (Trigger on $TA not allowed).

 

Other option we explored was to have trigger created on the base table on which "FULL TEXT INDEX" is created and then look for the $TA values for negative sentiment provided $TA is populated before my custom trigger (after insert) on base table is executed. This also did not work because we dont know if $TA is populated first then after insert trigger on base table.

Re: Disable remove option in Employee Master

July 9, 2015, 7:00 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Re: Personas 2.0 - Call Transaction and Skip

≪ Previous: Re: Triggers on $TA tables (Text Analysis Tables)

$

0

0

Hi,

 

Give read only authorization to avoid removal employee master data. It is not possible to disable 'Remove' option in standard SAP.

 

Thanks.

Re: Personas 2.0 - Call Transaction and Skip

July 9, 2015, 7:00 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Bloqueio da MIRO mesmo com frete planejado

≪ Previous: Re: Disable remove option in Employee Master

$

0

0

Thanks Steve for your response. The 2 main tabs that i was referring to bring to the main screen was the Partners Tab and Notes Tab. Based on your response, I guess we need to pass that and not think of bring it to the front. Thanks again.

Bloqueio da MIRO mesmo com frete planejado

July 10, 2015, 7:16 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Error while developing Web report in BPC 10.1NW

≪ Previous: Re: Personas 2.0 - Call Transaction and Skip

$

0

0

Bom dia pessoal!

Gostaria de tirar uma dúvida com vocês. Eu tenho o seguinte processo:

 

1. Criação de pedido de compra utilizando a condição FBR1 para frete, e dentro dessa condição alterando o fornecedor para o código da transportadora.
2. Lançamento de MIGO
3. Lançamento de MIRO (opção fatura) do material
4. Lançamento de MIRO (opção fatura) do frete (neste caso o SAP me traz automaticamente os dados da transportadora assim que eu seleciono a opção abaixo de custo planejado).

 

O ponto é: a primeira MIRO do material fica com a opção de bloqueio de pagamento como “Autorizado Para Pagamento”. Mas a segunda MIRO do frete fica com bloqueio R – Revisão de Faturas.

 

Por ser custo planejado, e eu não estou usando débito posterior, o SAP não deveria deixar a segunda MIRO também como Livre para pagamento?

 

Detalhe que o mestre de fornecedor da transportadora tem a opção de Autorizado para Pagamento selecionada.

 

Obrigada desde já pela ajuda!

 

Cristina

Error while developing Web report in BPC 10.1NW

July 10, 2015, 7:17 am

Latest and popular articles on SAP ERP

≫ Next: Fields Mapping error in ALM-Solman Adapter

≪ Previous: Bloqueio da MIRO mesmo com frete planejado

$

0

0

Hello Folks,

This is regarding error in Web reports development (BPC 10.1 NW). After selecting Dimensions in column, system is throwing an error  “Column size is bigger than IMG Max column size (50)”

Could you please guide me how to overcome this issue?
Thank you,
Srini