Hi, do you mind to share your code in the index.html, xml view and controller when display the vizchart? Because currently i am doing on it but it cant work. I am not sure where is going wrong.
Thanks
Re: Is it impossible to use viz charts in XML views??
↧
↧
Re: vendor, price(basic price) auto update in pr creation from last grn/po
Dear Jaya,
Agreed with Dibyendu Patra, In case of valuated material; price in PR is adopted via accounting view in Material Master etc, Source determination is only option for info-record and agreement but Purchase Order can't be. Other than this you may check the feasibility of Custom development.
Regards
Mohsin abbasi
↧
Re: AVAILABILITY CHECK FAILED
Hi Manjunath,
This depends upon the way of doing ATP at the time of creation or later depending upon supplies (rescheduling BOP)
System will not perform perform background availability
What do you mean by this? You have still not mentioned where have you maintained this as asked in earlier post?
system rounded 5000
Since you have maintained partial delivery allowed, so system is proposing what it could confirm. Why would you confirm 5000 when you don't have 5000 to confirm? Why would you do over-confirmation if you don't have supplies?
But confirmed only 2000, system to give Error message
Regards
Rahul
↧
Re: Changing the caption of a text field
Hi Shrinath
Two options:
1) Insert a floating field to text object that will hold the right text
2) In script (FormCalc only)
$.TextField1.value.#text = "Sold-to"/"Bill-to
Shai
↧
Re: EDI mit B1
Hallo,
wir haben auch ein AddOn was EDI Abwicklungen ermöglicht.
Viele Grüße
M. Kohler
EMail martina.kohler@init-consulting.de
init consulting AG
↧
↧
hi friends
is there any possibility to changes incoming excise invoice ro level qty fileds
actually that grpo qty will be excess than the client needs to edit to that qty reduce is there any possibility?????????????????????????
↧
Re: Acceptance and Rejection reason in ROS
Great nice work, so you have found the class which is getting called after the ACCEPT button is getting clicked.
You mentioned role is same for all, so do you mean anyone can log in to the portal and approve the supplier?
I guess not, so what i meant by roles is- 'Roles will be maintained on the basis of Authorization object given to the users' and for that you will have to create authority check objects (SU21) and apply them inside the code on the method PROCESS_EVENT.
If not and you are only looking to do away with the error shared as below- 
Create an Implicit Enhancement inside the method /SAPSRM/IF_SUCO_CLL_AO_SREG~ACCEPT and add in the 'Acceptance reason' to do away with the error OR all you want to achieve when this button is pressed.
Still in doubt please be more clear in what you are looking to achieve here.
Regards,
Mrityunjai
↧
SLA reporting in MDG excluding Weekends Dates
Hi,
How to configure SLA for MDG Change Requests which excludes weekends -Saturday and Sunday ?
For example, In case for a particular Priority SLA defined is '1 day', then, a CR created on Friday 5 pm should not violate SLA till 5 pm Monday.
How this can be achieved ?
Thanks & Regards,
Swati
↧
Re: Tax Code to be changed in dealer scenario
I dont understand why you need to tax code with the same condition types? In trader / dealer purchase, you should use a Zero tax code by maintaining condition records with zero percentage for BED / SED / AED and 100% for JMX1 / JSX1 / JAX1
You must change the Excise base value and duties as per the dealer invoice during Goods receipt / Excise invoice and Post it.
While performing MIRO, you should change the Base amount same as the Excise base value in MIGO and check.
No need to change the tax code in MIRO.
Let me know if you are doing the process differently than I explained.
↧
↧
Re: Backpropagation Neural Networks producing negative output
Thanks Antoine.
↧
Issue in adding line items to array.
Hi All,
Here I am developing mobile application using sapui5.
↧
Re: user exit for idoc extension for material master (matmas05)
Scenario : idoc extension for material master
Basic IDoc type | MATMAS05 |
Version |
|
IDoc extension | MATMASEXT |
Custom segment | Z1MARAM |
Fields in Custom Segment | SIZE , APPROVER |
Parent of Custom Segment | E1MARAM |
|
|
GO TO WE31 TO CREATE SEGMENT Z1MARA1.
↧
Re: Delete change logs created on same day
That mean you need to keep chang log data record count as 0 for today(mean today load you may updated delta data from dso to further).
if yes then you can delete chang log table data thru SE14(Manually).
if you tried thru process chains then please check their conditions which you used to delete change log.
older than days - mention as 0 and try it.
↧
↧
Re: Break Point is not triggering in the Class Method
Hi Sandy,
It was an WF-BATCH Authorization Issue.
I got it. Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Sadiq K
↧
Re: To ignore Forwarding agent in Invoice but it should come in Return order when created with reference to original invoice.
Hi Gurus,
Please share your comments/solution. as this requirement is urgent...
↧
Re: Distribution channel material master data
Thank you , so for example if it's e-commerce where can I enter for the price and shipping cost ?
↧
Re: enquire self registration in central SLD
Hello Emily,
Select No SLD registration,
↧
↧
Technical Bid Visibility C-folder
Dear All,
We have configured Two Envelope Bidding and we are facing an issue with the technical bid visibility while submitting technical RFX Response.
Suppliers are able to view technical bid of each other. I have gone through many forums and all routing to one conclusion i.e. ROLE Authorization issue.
I would brief the details so if anyone has some pointers if i have done some thing wrong in the process.
We are in SUS decoupled bidding scenario.
SRM and C-Folders are on the same server but different Client.
SUS system is where the suppliers are logged in a separate server
Suppliers are created in all the three clients
SRM
SRM C-folder
SUS with the below roles
/SAPSRM/SUCO_BIDDER_EHP1
SAP_CFX_USER
SAP_CFX_COMP_CREATOR
Service for c-folder is maintained in SRM system with RFC user and the user has also been assigned the same authorization as above along with SXMB_MONI related access to create documents across systems.
Is there anything wrong in this, I have tried removing the comp_creator role but still the error persist. we also found that SAP_CFX_USER had authorization * in c-folder object which was changed to USER.
We have checked across the systems and none of the bidders or RFC user has SAP_ALL access.
Do let me know if there is something else we can do on this ?
Regards
Ushir
↧
Re: Urgent Help - 4 Weeks data using Query filter
No I meant does your calendar have calendar date and fiscal week side by side so you can look at a date and see what fiscal week it is?
↧
Re: Need information for SMP 3.0 Service pack and SQL Version for Windows 2012
1. You should be able to install SMP 3.0.x.x on any OS mentioned in above screenshot.
2. I dont see any problem using SQL server 2008 for Windows Server 2012 (at the same time it is always recommend to use the latest release)
PFB ref link for more inputs:
Hardware and Software Requirements for Installing SQL Server 2008
Hardware and Software Requirements for Installing SQL Server 2012
Regards,
JK
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
