Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8798 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Portal groups provisioning status shows error but assignment is happening in portal

$
0
0

Hi,

 

As I do not know what SP level your GRCFND_A component is on and what your Enterprise Portal stack level is etc, I am not able to give exact advice. However, I have found that GRC does have some issues with provisioning via the Web Service connections.

 

I would advise you to raise a OSS ticket with SAP Support and get them to give you the specific solution for your issue.

 

Previously, on SP12 at one project, we had a similar issue and were asked to implement a few SAP notes on the GRC system, only for the issue to be resolved by implementing a fix on the Portal side.

 

When the issue has been GRC + Portal related, I have had to always get SAP OSS support to help resolve the issue.


Re: Why Rebuild option is disabled ?

$
0
0

You are right,

 

if i create a new project it's fine.

 

 

=)

Issue with SQL statement (sequence.NEXTVAL) in SAP HANA SP80

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

SAP HANA fails to execute an insert statement for a global temp table with a sequence.next value evaluating and joining with a non empty column table.

 

The error message is as follows:

 

Could not execute 'INSERT INTO "Temp_IDs" ("ID",indexid) SELECT ID, "index_seq".NEXTVAL orderId FROM ...' in 3.777 seconds.

 

After that it seems that the indexserver crashes and brings the whole hana instance offline for some time. (Crash dump can be attached if needed)

 

The following isolated SQL script can reproduce the error on any SAP HANA instance version 80 or lower:

 

CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY COLUMN TABLE "Temp_IDs" (     "INDEXID" BIGINT CS_FIXED,     "ID" VARCHAR(36) );
CREATE sequence "index_seq" increment by 1 start with 1 minvalue 1 maxvalue 4611686018427387903 no cycle;
CREATE COLUMN TABLE "xyz::entity" (     "ID" VARCHAR(36) NOT NULL,     "IDTYPE" VARCHAR(36) NOT NULL,     "SOURCESYSTEM" VARCHAR(255), PRIMARY KEY ("ID") );
INSERT INTO "xyz::entity" (ID, IDTYPE) VALUES ('6A33824A-082A-4699-AC02-ADCB514C71E6', '6A33824A-082A-4699-AC02-ADCB514C71E6');
INSERT INTO  "Temp_IDs" ("ID",indexid) SELECT ID, "index_seq".NEXTVAL orderId FROM "xyz"."xyz::entity" LIMIT 1;
truncate table "Temp_IDs";
drop table  "Temp_IDs";
drop table "xyz::entity";
drop sequence "index_seq";

(Please note: if Temp_IDs is not a temp table, but a regular table then the issue doesn't occur; If there is no "index_seq".NEXTVAL call in the insert statement then the issue doesn't occur)

 

 

 

Does anybody know a proper "workaround" for this scenario (e.g. to get the next value from a sequence like sequence.NEXTVAL without calling sequence.NEXTVAL)?

Re: Why Rebuild option is disabled ?

$
0
0

Please mark the question as answered then .. thanks!

Re: Po Creation Price Change Updation.

$
0
0

Umm, I am not sure what  cl_po->my_recheck_queue. does.


But I guess you are getting into infinite loop because you are changing the item within the process of changing an item. So, whenever you try to set the condition, PROCESS_ITEM must be triggered. Hence, a better way is to declare a flag as attribute of the class of the implementation, and set it whenever you get in loop for the first time. and then check the flag before calling set_conditions again.

Re: PO Net Price change after Invoice in Service PO

$
0
0

Hi,

   No need to change the assignment of ZNBF to NB doc type. You just make the field as optional for the field selection key PT9F and test the scenario. There is no assignment required for PT9F, since its hard coded in the program itself.

 

Regards,

AKPT                   

Re: Notifications icon for "Communications" stream not updating (again)

$
0
0

It has been consistently better for me now for two days (Friday and Saturday), while others are still reporting problems, so it may be a "rolling" fix.

Re: Partner determination problem

$
0
0

Hi Friend,

 

In Procedure you had used AG for sold to party partner function and in Customer master you had used SP . Make both the same so that you issue will be resolved.

 

Regards,

Kishor.


Re: Po Creation Price Change Updation.

$
0
0

Solved by

 

Replacing

 

         im_item->set_conditions( EXPORTING im_conditions = lt_conditions ).

       

        IF NOT  cl_po->my_recheck_queue IS INITIAL.

        CLEAR cl_po->my_recheck_queue.

      ENDIF.

 

With


Data  cl_po  TYPE REF TO cl_po_header_handle_mm.


CALL METHOD cl_po->set_tkomv(

       im_tkomv = lt_conditions

       im_item_conditions_changed = mmpur_yes ).

 

 

Regards,

Venkat Ramesh.V

Re: Consume oData Service from Workbench

Re: Customer hierarchy pricing - discount not determined

$
0
0

Hi Norbert,

I am not aware of any other reason than this what is causing the issue.

Pl take help from your ABAPer and update here about the root cause.

thanks

 

Regards,

Aayush Jain   

IDoc Errors How to extract for multiple IDocs?

$
0
0

Hello experts

 

I am generating IDocs using Business Objects Data Services into SAP ECC and SAP CRM. After processing these IDocs there are some IDocs that failed. Is there a way to get the errors for these IDocs without going into each individual IDoc?

 

SR

Re: Planned/production order generating for a sales order that is complete

$
0
0

Ravindra,

OK.  You got the stock movement right, the material was transferred to the alternate plant and received into stock, that's very good troubleshooting so far.

 

Now, show me the current MD04 in the alternate plant.

 

Best Regards,

DB49

Re: Cannot launch XS App using HANA Trial

$
0
0

Hi Aziz,

 

I tried it on my account and it worked. But then I deleted the application / trial instance and deployed a new one (it was a test application anyway) and I am receiving the same error now. I suspect that it's a general problem, but I guess that someone from the hanatrial team should clarify (it may be related to the underlying infrastructure, apparently apps on the s7hanaxs 'server' have this problem).

 

The critical flag on your application is probably due to some resource limitation (but is most likely unrelated to your problem). You can check which resource is causing the status by clicking on the Metric Details link (just below the status itself) and the checking if any of your graphs go above the red line.

 

Regards,

Serban

CR 2013 - prompting1.html error

$
0
0

I've installed CR 2013 on a Win 7 PC. When I click OK on a parameter prompt screen to run a report, I keep getting this error:

 

Script Error

Promting Error.png

I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling several times. I am using the CR 2013 SP4 install image, with a full license. None of the other discussions mentioning "prompting1.html" have any definitive answers. Formatting the hard drive is not an acceptable answer.I have installed this on other PCs in the office, with no problems,.

 

Thanks.


Re: Sick Error

$
0
0

Hii SS

 

how can i upgrade the MS SQL Service pack pls tell me the step by step.

 

 

Regards

Dhananjay Patil

Re: LSMW for PA41

$
0
0

Dear Niladri,

 

Payroll processing is not part of the project.

 

As through PA41, positions can not be changed, I will have to do that through PP01.

 

But can you help with the error message coming while running LSMW for PA41 which is "Org assignment cannot be changed if start date changed".

 

Regards

Simran

Re: Error in UWL for MSS in Portal 7.4

$
0
0

Hi Mohan

 

I hope you are well and many thanks for using the SAP Discussion Forums .

 

In relation to the scenario that you have described you mentioned the following:

 

  • You are on Portal 7.4 and ECC EHP7, basic setting for UWL config under System Admin in Portal has been done, apart from that no other changes been made in SWFVISU and to the properties of PCD objects in Portal.

 

  • Working: Leave request respective to the Manager are appearing under UWL

 

  • Not Working: Clicking on any link from UWL taking us to the same screen for leave requests.

 

Now based upon the extract you provided from the HTTP Watch Trace have you captured a default trace error log file yourself to ensure there are no accompanied underlying error exceptions?

 

What is interesting here is that you mentioned no other changes apart from the upgrade have been performed.  So what we should have here is a decision task that then launches either a Web Dynpro ABAP or a SAPGUI or in turn raises an event.

 

Kindly capture a trace and let me know if there are any underlying exceptions appearing.

 

Kindly update me as per your findings.

 

Kind Regards

 

Troy Cronin - Enterprise Portal Support Engineer

Re: Fiori Application Copy - Launchpad Error?

$
0
0

Update: I recreated LPD_CUST and this particular issue is resolved.  Now, when I try to launch the copied app I get: index.html is not found.  I tried creating an index.html under the BSP and added the following code:

 

<!DOCTYPE HTML>

<html>

   <head>

     <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">

     <meta http-equiv='Content-Type' content='text/html;charset=UTF-8'/>

 

     <script src="resources/sap-ui-core.js"

         id="sap-ui-bootstrap"

         data-sap-ui-libs="sap.m"

         data-sap-ui-theme="sap_bluecrystal">

     </script>

     <!-- only load the mobile lib "sap.m" and the "sap_bluecrystal" theme -->

 

     <script>

 

         var page = sap.ui.view({id:"main", viewName:"ztsapv1.main"});

         app.addPage(page);

         app.placeAt("content");

     </script>

 

   </head>

   <body class="sapUiBody" role="application">

     <div id="content"></div>

   </body>

</html>

 

Now I am getting a blank page - the app will not launch.

 

Any ideas on the right approach?

Ordering party has to be a company

$
0
0


Hi SRM Gurus,

 

We are working for SAP SRM upgrade from version 5.0 to 7.03.

 

We had AC workflow and moved to PC workflow in upgraded system for contract.

 

We are able to create the contract without any issues and the workflow is triggering approval to purchaing group manager.

 

But when try to approve the contract from user's inbox, we are getting the error 'Ordering party has to be a company'.

 

I have checked the org structure, there is no inconsistency in the purchasing group or creator or manager.

 

The results for bbp_bp_om_integrate are Green.

 

The work item is in status 'Ready'.

 

What could be reason for this error?

 

Thanks & Regards,

Siddappa

Viewing all 8798 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images