i just did a PI refresh using an export of the source system. I was doing it because we don't have the support packs to build a new system at the same level. After the refresh the new system was like an initial install, and didn't have any of the support packs that are in the original system. I normally do a refresh, all that comes back, not sure why this didn't. Have anybody seen that in PI 7.31?
PI Refresh with EXPORT/Import
↧
↧
Re: NLS in SQL Anywhere 16
Hello Arcady,
They were previously using version 10 of the product. Just had a clarification from them - the question is around storing and working with Vietnamese text. They do not require the product documentation, admin tools, etc. to be in Vietnamese.
So your response above confirms that they would be able to have an application which stores and retrieves (including select queries, etc.) Vietnamese text in the SQL Anywhere product... whether it is via the primary database, Ultralite, MobiLink, etc.?
Thanks, just trying to make sure there's no limitations around what they want to do.
Cheers!
↧
Re: (MX) Contabilidad Electrónica - RME 2014 Anexo 24
Hello SAP Experts
I am still wondering at what level the trial balance should be reported?
According with Quinta Resolución Miscelanea Fiscal (5th SAT RMF Update) the trial balance for the purposes of this fraction, it shall be sent at least to the GL account level and subaccount at first level (16 OCT 2014 I.2.8.1.6.)
La balanza de comprobación para los efectos de esta fracción, se enviará al menos a nivel de cuenta de mayor y subcuenta a primer nivel (16.OCT.2014 I.2.8.1.6.)
I am interpreting this SAT clarification as following:
With this 5th RMF update, my conclusions are:
a) I think Activo, and Activos Circulantes are not "GL account", I think this are only concepts
Also there is no Coding Group to this level (so I set Activo as level 0).
b) I think the Account and Sub-Account at first level starts on Caja according with this logic
What is more, SAP system design does not support subaccounts or levels within their chart of accounts (also this is mention on the SAP note)
I really think the report level for trail balance is usign natural numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
c) Next levels, I think next levels are optional isnt it?
(with decimals 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, etc.) because are on the second level (segundo nivel)
I really wonder why some of you decide to report to the second level? I think this is an optional report level according with Quinta Resolución de Miscelanea Fiscal
However, analyzing the SAP standard solution "Customizing Activities for Electronic Accounting (Mexico) Version 2.1" realesed on November, included on SAP Note 204663 I found they explain there is an exception:
"There is an exception for the Capital Accounts, because in the Results of Current
and Previous Years, both natures exist. In this case, the accounts have to be
assigned at the second level of the grouping codes to be able to have the correct
nature. When the XML file will be generated, the first level grouping code will be
used"
Someone has a picture or screenshot of how it looks these accounts usign the SAP standard functionality?
- Does the XML show the level 1 or 2 for this current an previous results?
- I think usign the retained account is not enough isn'it?
- Do you need to customizing something in the system to determine the current a previous year results?
I think the SAT solution display the first level (54 / 55), but according with the result a D (debit) or A (credit) is set in place
Thanks and I really appreciate all your collaboration!
Note: I am trying to summarize all the doubts in this item for resolution and for clear understanding
Fernando Luna
↧
Re: SD: 2 order types with same number range (2nd order type should reset to 1)
Thank you.
↧
Re: HRESS_A_W4 declaration portion is missing
Are you saying the declaration text "Under penalties..." is missing but you see Declaration label and a check box next to it or that you don't see either? What upgrade was done? Maybe the upgrade introduced the state-specific forms and you are trying to add a state-specific form which doesn't have the texts maintained. See SAP KBA 1699725 and the linked document for details.
↧
↧
Re: How to export fiscal period data for each GL and Cost Centre
Hi,
Yes. First, if both reports can help them, this is great. Thus, save the layout for them and run a job to do a tests. This is the faster way to get the report and then export in excel format or anyone else they want.
If the performance is good in foreground mode, you can run and export.
JPA
↧
SAP PO 7.31 Operation Mapping in BPM - Could not invoke service reference name
Hi
I have followed William Li's blog on how to use Operation Mapping in a BPM. I have built and deployed this but I get a run time error when it executes the operation mapping. A technical error during invocation: Could not invoke service reference name
This error is normally related to the wrong service reference type being selected. The guides and blogs suggest in the case of an Operation Mapping that is imported as a WSDL the correct one is WS.
The operation mapping I have imported has a Outbound Async to Inbound Async service interface.
Has anybody experienced this error?
↧
Re: No price could be determined for subcontractingin CK40N
Hi Lokesh and Kamal
Thanks for your reply !!
any problem if use the DO NOT COST Option at material master for avoding the cost calculation while running the CK40N.
Kidnly advise.
Thanks
Regards
Sudharsana Vamsi
↧
NFe GRC - Lote DF
Pessoal, boa noite.
Em primeiro lugar, gostaria de parabenizar as threads que encontrei no fórum.
Foram muito válidas para o dia a dia. Dessa forma, resolvi efetuar um cadastro para colaborar também com possíveis duvidas e trocar diversas experiencias.
Inicio minha abertura no fórum solicitando um auxílio.
Recentemente, migramos pra NFe 3,10. Estamos com dificuldade para em emitir NFe para o DF.
A NFe é enviada, porém, o lote ao ser processado, acaba demorando por responder e consequentemente gera um erro.
Consultando na sxi_monitor, pelo ID da mensagem, o mesmo apresenta o seguinte erro:
Estamos com o status de comunicação de sucesso com a SEFAZ de DF, da mesma forma também já verificamos os endereços no repositorio PI BATCH e BATSR.
Alguma dica ou caminho para seguirmos??
Obrigado.
Att,
↧
↧
Re: Issue about automatic purchase requistion creation from production order using PP02 external control key after running MRP
Hi Kiran:
According to your said I have solved my issue.Thank you very much .
↧
Re: UST04 user not found
Thanks for your comments, I actually need to understand what user has been assigned the transaction but at the role/profile level so trying to understand the best tables to use, would it be the AGR_USERS (for roles) and UST04 (for profiles)?
↧
Re: Error while installing BI 4.1 SP3 on SP2
Hi All,
We skipped that warning and installed the file successfully. And for your information we getting this warning for Client tools and Crystal Enterprise also.
Thank for your help.
Regards,
Ramesh Jothimani
↧
Re: OLAP Analysis need to access Universe
Just to follow on from Tammy's reply... If you use SQL Server Analysis Services and build a cube then Analysis OLAP is your ideal tool to explore and analyze your cube data. Analysis OLAP connects to the cube directly and does not require a Universe.
Regrads
Ian
↧
↧
Re: Overiding Row Axis - Select Multiple Members
C117 - Is the backup formula.
N114 - Is the Member Selector.
↧
Re: ABAP Runtime Error in f-53 for a Specific single vendor.
Hi Surendra Babu,
Are using some * ?
JPA
↧
Re: Adding date and time icons in Selection screen
Thanks a lot Raghunadh. That works too. But any idea on how to bring the icon closer to the input field?
BR,
Gita
↧
Re: AddOn error
Hi,
Please repost at SDK forum to get quick assistance. Refer similar discussion from SDK forum.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan
↧
↧
Re: Anyone been able to get the sap.ca.ui.FileUpload control working with a Gateway OData service?
Thanks Pauline, that's interesting to see their response, although rather disappointing too. Considering UI5 is primarily designed to work with Gateway which uses OData Model, it seems really stupid to not make that control work with the OData Model. Hopefully they will change that else I doubt that control will be used much.
↧
Re: Move users between instances
I have, and so it's all done. I need to move users online, what would it had no effect on their work and do not lose their session. Is it possible? in SMLG I have two groups as users move between them?
↧
Re: SP notification
Could you advice your condition for blocking delivery?
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
